Understanding the 2020 Election Loss: A Perspective on Denial
Written on
Chapter 1: The Reality of the 2020 Election
The remarkable phenomenon of claiming victory after a significant defeat raises numerous questions about political perception.
This passage highlights the complexities of belief and perception in political discourse.
Section 1.1: The Facts of the 2020 Election
It is a well-established fact that former President Donald Trump lost the 2020 Presidential election by a staggering 7,060,140 votes, with no evidence of fraud or vote tampering. Additionally, he fell short by 74 Electoral College votes.
Assumed Fact: Trump exhibits a strong aversion to losing.
I don't align myself strictly with any political party; instead, I evaluate issues based on their overall impact on the nation. It seems the public has been misled into thinking that one party possesses all the solutions, which is a false notion. Both parties have candidates genuinely interested in making a positive difference, despite their differences.
As we reflect on the timeline, it’s now 2022—over eighteen months since the election—and Trump still believes he won by a landslide. This is perplexing, especially considering even Fox News acknowledged Biden’s victory.
Section 1.2: The Impact of Gun Control Policies
In light of events like the shootings in El Paso and Dayton, Trump's approach to gun control reflects a troubling inconsistency.
Chapter 2: The Mindset of Denial
Diving into Trump's conviction that he won the last election, it becomes clear he orchestrated meetings to devise strategies to contest the results before the events of January 6, 2021. He even sought to pressure Vice President Pence to declare certain electoral votes invalid.
Despite numerous lawsuits and efforts to change the narrative, Trump continues to deny his loss. This persistence allows him to maintain influence over his supporters, fueling hopes for a future campaign, even though he has not formally declared his candidacy for 2024.
Section 2.1: The Power of Influence
It's astonishing how Trump manages to maintain control over his followers, perpetuating a narrative that resonates with them. Yet, I have yet to encounter a supporter who can substantiate why they believe he won.
What criteria do you consider when selecting a candidate?
Choosing the right candidate can be challenging. I often evaluate candidates based on essential traits, and if I find insufficient information, I might abstain from voting for that position altogether.
Section 2.2: The Importance of Values in Politics
A valuable lesson I learned from a politically astute educator was to prioritize actions over words when assessing politicians.
Burt Plumb emphasized "higher-order thinking skills," encouraging students to explore multiple solutions to problems. This approach cultivates critical thinking, which is crucial for future success.
As we approach another election cycle, it’s vital to rise above the animosity between parties and make informed decisions.
The essence of my evaluation process involves recognizing both strengths and weaknesses in candidates. Ultimately, I rely on a value-based framework to guide my choices, focusing on integrity, honor, and truth.
Mr. Trump, despite his intelligence, lacks many of the qualities I consider essential in a leader. His actions throughout his term in office raise significant ethical questions, particularly regarding his divisive rhetoric and association with extremist groups.
In summary, if Trump decides to run for office again, I will vote against him, favoring the most viable candidate. The consequences of electing him again could be detrimental.
Thank you for engaging with this discussion!