Chapter 1: The Nostalgia of Smell

Every year, as the temperature rises and I first open a bottle of sunscreen, it feels akin to uncorking a bottle of childhood vacations. The initial whiff that escapes transports me through layers of memory, evoking an indescribable wave of nostalgia.

A curious inquiry arises: where does this experience reside? It isn't merely the recognition of an object, nor is it strictly a sensation felt in the body or mind. Instead, it encapsulates a fleeting transformation of perception, akin to a deluge washing over an experience. Pinpointing its location appears futile. This same inquiry can be applied to dreams: when you find yourself within a dream, where exactly are you? The experience is anchored in reality, yet you're still in your bed. What then defines the space of consciousness?

While this question may seem trivial, it’s crucial for understanding why consciousness often eludes us when approached from conceptual or scientific angles. For neuroscientists, consciousness is predominantly viewed as residing within the brain. This perspective has its merits, especially given that certain anesthetics can inhibit consciousness by affecting specific brain regions.

However, this viewpoint hinges on the assumption that the brain generates consciousness. The cessation of consciousness under anesthetic does not necessarily validate this notion, just as the idea that the brain merely receives consciousness would similarly cease if its mechanisms were interrupted. Moreover, these considerations do not adequately address the complexities of how time and space relate to the steadfast realm of subjective experience.

The Swiss psychologist Carl Jung posited that the psyche is "not entirely confined to space and time." In a 1959 BBC interview, he asserted, "You can have dreams or visions of the future; you can see around corners. Only the ignorant deny these facts. It's clear they exist and have always existed, indicating that the psyche is, in part, independent of these constraints."

Another captivating phenomenon is the near-death experience, where individuals often report observing their surroundings from an external vantage point. Many can recall specific details or events during these experiences. The shared elements of numerous near-death experiences provoke a profound question regarding our fixation on objective reality in a world where the concept of "where" renders descriptions of light tunnels as inherently "nowhere"—and thus, "illusory." Recent research on dying patients has indicated a brief surge in brain activity as it shuts down, which some eagerly interpret as evidence of hallucinations. Yet, this interpretation raises a fundamental question: where is that patient during such an experience? Are they in their brain, or in a radiant tunnel of light? How can we comprehend this through the lens of molecular interactions?

These dilemmas stem from the belief that space, time, and causation can be reduced to fundamental properties of reality, grounding all studies of the mind. Whatever transpires in consciousness must be traceable to a series of physical interactions, akin to billiard balls colliding. However, the failure of quantum physics to yield satisfactory answers only underscores the rigidity of objectivity within brain sciences.

Our tools for studying the brain have advanced, yet they largely revolve around identifying which areas activate during specific thoughts or actions. For instance, we can pinpoint the brain regions associated with anger. However, the emotional responses we experience—whether it's anger towards a bully or frustration over a sports loss—remain disconnected from mere neural activity. They represent a self intertwined with the world in ways that resist reduction to simplistic mental constructs.

What can be gleaned from this? Ancient philosophies often lacked a term precisely equivalent to our modern concept of consciousness. Instead, they employed terms like "spirit" or "soul," which contemporary society has largely dismissed as childish superstition. Yet, these concepts may hold deeper significance than we acknowledge.

Consider the intriguing sequence in the biblical book of Ezekiel. In chapter 37, the prophet is transported "by (or in) the spirit" to a valley filled with dry bones. He is commanded to prophesy to these bones and the wind, causing the bones to rise, animated by the "four winds" that breathe life into them. This sequence illustrates a prophecy of Israel's redemption.

A slight misinterpretation exists in English translations of this passage. The terms "spirit," "breath," and "wind" all derive from the same Hebrew word (ר֖וּחַ). The interplay here is remarkable: the force that animates the bones is the same that brings Adam to life from earth's dust. The wind sweeps across the valley, infusing the bones with vitality. Notably, this entire episode is a vision; Ezekiel is carried by the "spirit" to a "place" where he witnesses these events unfold.

Thus, "spirit" serves as both the enabler and creator of perception—a reality beyond the physical that animates existence but remains elusive within any tangible aspect of ourselves. Like pinning a butterfly to examine it, some essence may vanish in the process. If "spirit" is also the force that shapes the reality we inhabit (as Jesus states in John 4, "God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in Spirit and truth"), could we be mistaken in prioritizing objectivity?

From another philosophical tradition, the Chandogya Upanishad states:

"The Spirit who is in the body does not grow old and does not die, and no one can ever kill the Spirit who is everlasting. This is the real castle of Brahman wherein dwells all the love of the universe. It is Atman, pure Spirit, beyond sorrow, old age, and death; beyond evil and hunger and thirst. It is Atman whose love is Truth, whose thoughts are Truth..."

Words that encapsulate such profound realities can be taxing in an era demanding finite categories as tools. Nevertheless, our experiences affirm that reductionist approaches fall short of capturing the essence of awareness in this vibrant and intricate reality. For millennia, religious traditions have recognized a profound connection between conscious existence, selfhood, morality, and the essence of being itself. No amount of advanced scientific inquiry into the brain and body has swayed my belief that these insights remain as valuable as ever.

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this article, consider supporting my work by buying me a coffee here. To explore and share unlimited articles on Medium, please use my referral link here. A portion of the proceeds aids my writing endeavors.

Chapter 2: The Intersection of Smell and Memory

As we explore the relationship between smell and memory, it's essential to understand how our sense of smell influences our recollections and emotional responses.

This first video, titled "How is the sense of smell connected to memories and emotion? - With Dr. Stuart Firestein," delves into the intricate ways our olfactory senses can evoke memories and emotions, providing insights into the neuroscience behind these experiences.

The relationship between smell and memory is further illuminated in the second video.

Titled "Smell and Memory," this video expands on how our sense of smell can trigger vivid recollections, showcasing the powerful link between our senses and our memories.