# Denial of Climate Change: A Risk We Cannot Afford
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Climate Change
The facts surrounding climate change are undeniable, regardless of personal belief. A clear example can be observed in Alaska, which constitutes around 18% of the total land area of the United States and contains 53% of the nation’s carbon stored in its permafrost, as stated by the US Geological Survey.
The warming climate in Alaska is affecting the Arctic ice, permafrost, and the natural freeze-thaw cycles. The consequences of melting glaciers and thawing permafrost are not just local concerns; they could extend beyond Alaskan borders. Increased carbon emissions and rising sea levels could lead to widespread issues that affect many regions.
While Alaskans may be experiencing the early effects of global warming, an overwhelming 97% of climate scientists concur that human activities are contributing to this phenomenon. Unfortunately, a significant number of Americans remain unaware of this scientific consensus, mistakenly believing that there is ongoing debate or uncertainty about global warming.
The prevalence of anti-science sentiment surrounding climate change is so pervasive that it threatens to hinder effective environmental protection measures. The withdrawal from international climate agreements and the introduction of restrictive legislation on climate education could have dire consequences for future generations.
As rational beings, we have the capacity to question beliefs and theories. Yet, when the vast majority of experts in a field agree on a particular issue, failing to accept it as fact is not only naïve but potentially catastrophic.
Section 1.1: The Rise of Anti-Science Legislation
A new wave of anti-science legislation has emerged in various state and local governments across the United States. These proposed bills permit alternative theories to evolution to be taught in schools and allow educators to challenge the idea that humans have contributed to climate change.
For instance, Florida is currently considering such legislation, while Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee already have similar laws in place. This presents a troubling irony, as these southern states may face some of the most severe consequences of global warming in the 21st century.
A study published in Science predicts that the U.S. Gross Domestic Product could decline by 1.6% to 5.6% over the next century, with the majority of these losses concentrated in the southern states. Agricultural yields may plummet by as much as 50%, and rising temperatures could lead to increased mortality rates. The states that appear least concerned about climate change could be the ones most adversely affected.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Challenge of Misinformation
Section 1.2: The Need for Action
We live in an era rife with alternative facts, where unfavorable news can be dismissed as "fake." However, the reality of climate change persists, indifferent to individual beliefs. Scientific truths are not swayed by personal or political ideologies; they exist irrespective of our acceptance.
Fortunately, we possess the technology to make positive changes to our environment. Electric vehicles and renewable energy options are becoming more prevalent. Numerous politicians at various levels are working hard to inform the public and take appropriate actions. Many states and cities have committed to adhering to the Paris Climate Agreement.
What we need now is the resolve to confront the issue head-on, ideally before the consequences become too severe. This situation calls for a greater emphasis on scientific understanding rather than political maneuvering.
Chapter 2: Listening to Scientific Expertise
The first video titled "Climate deniers don't deny climate change any more" explores how the narrative surrounding climate change denial has evolved.
The second video, "Why Climate Change Denial Still Exists In The U.S.," delves into the reasons behind the persistence of climate change denial despite overwhelming evidence.
Science remains the most reliable tool we have for uncovering truths. It plays a crucial role in guiding us toward informed decisions. Often, emotionally charged political topics fail to withstand scientific scrutiny. Embracing the truth can empower us to prepare effectively for the future.
Read more from The Good Men Project on Medium:
I’m Tired of Taking on Her Emotions
Do you ever wonder — “How’d we get here again?”
5 Signs It Isn’t Love, Even Though They Say, ‘I Love You’
Have you been burned by ‘love’? Thomas Fiffer identifies five red flags you’re not likely to be looking for at the…
Dear Lover: I Don’t Want Your Loyalty
Loyalty is the toxic mimic of devotion.
This article was originally published on The Good Men Project.
About Matthew Brennan:
Matthew Brennan is a freelance copywriter and journalist based in the Chicago area. He is also the author of Virus and Us: a Letter From Father to Son in the Midst of the Pandemic.